Skip to content

docs: price SIE Serverless by usage, source the open-models-for-coding claim - #33

Merged
rparundekar merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/fix-pricing-units-and-sources
Nov 11, 2026
Merged

rparundekar merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/fix-pricing-units-and-sources

Conversation

@rparundekar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Three small doc fixes found while rewriting the cookbook blog posts on sie-web (PR superlinked/sie-web#966).

  • Pricing units. CHOOSING_WHERE_MODELS_RUN.md and the root README said SIE Serverless is "pay per call" and computed break-even as calls per run × price per call. The rate book bills by input/output tokens, pages, pairs, images, audio and GPU seconds, so the break-even now counts what one run uses in those units.
  • Source for the coding recipe's background. "Some teams have started running open models as the default for coding" now cites Revolut's move of about 2,000 engineers to GLM on 56 B200s at a blended $0.30 per million tokens (David Abitbol, AI Engineer NYC, October 2026).
  • Insurance agent README. The closed-claim overreach was called run 1 in example 3 and run 2 in Results. The transcripts aren't committed, so both now say "one run".

Not changed: the Qwen3-Embedding-4B "no published image in v0.10.1" lines. They're accurate for v0.10.1, and SIE v0.11.0 contradicts itself on this (RELEASE.md lists a cuda12-sglang-embedding image, docs/compatibility.md still marks the model unsupported).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…g claim

- CHOOSING_WHERE_MODELS_RUN.md and README: SIE Serverless bills for what
  each call uses (tokens, pages, pairs, images, audio, GPU seconds), not
  per call, so the break-even counts usage per run.
- route_coding_tasks_to_open_models_first: cite Revolut's move to GLM
  (David Abitbol, AI Engineer NYC, October 2026) for the background claim.
- check_invoice_against_claim: the closed-claim overreach was named as
  run 1 in one place and run 2 in another; say "one run" in both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@rparundekar
rparundekar requested a review from a team as a code owner November 11, 2026 06:15
The root README and the hosting guide now say SIE Serverless bills by
usage, but the copied Run it line in 47 recipe READMEs still said
"pay per call".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@rparundekar
rparundekar merged commit 45369d8 into main Nov 11, 2026
49 checks passed
@rparundekar
rparundekar deleted the docs/fix-pricing-units-and-sources branch November 11, 2026 14:37
@rparundekar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai review

@rparundekar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Review

Reviewed the diff against main (the branch was already up to date with main).

Checked:

  • Pricing units. The root README and CHOOSING_WHERE_MODELS_RUN.md now say SIE Serverless bills by usage. The break-even sum counts what one run uses in those units.
  • Revolut source. The talk page and its transcript at https://ai.engineer/nyc/2026/talks/revolut back every figure in the coding recipe's background: about 2,000 engineers, 56 B200s serving GLM 5.3, a blended $0.30 per million tokens, and about a tenth of the prior Anthropic and OpenAI spend.
  • Insurance README. Example 3 and Results now both say "one run" for the closed-claim overreach, so they no longer disagree.
  • tools/check_tree.py passes.

One finding, fixed in 85dec44: 47 recipe READMEs still said "With SIE Serverless you pay per call" in their Run it line. AGENTS.md tells contributors to copy that line from any recipe, so the old wording would have spread again. All 47 now say "you pay for what each call uses", matching the root README. A search finds no "pay per call" left in tracked files.

All 49 CI checks passed on 85dec44. Merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant