Skip to content

Security: radiantlab/LumiLab

SECURITY.md

Security

Reporting a vulnerability

Report it privately through Security > Report a vulnerability on this repository, not in a public issue. Say what an attacker can do, on which build (web or desktop, which platform), and how to reproduce it. Expect an answer within a week during the academic term.

Where the risk is

  • The desktop app is the real attack surface. Its webview reaches the file system through Tauri, under the grants in src-tauri/capabilities/. A script injected into the webview gets whatever those grants allow, so a new permission is reviewed as a security change.
  • The web build is a static export with no server, so server-side advisories in Next.js do not reach it at runtime; they are still patched, because they reach the build.
  • The e2e harnesses (e2e-tests/, e2e-web/) run only in CI and on contributors' machines, against the app's own build.

Keeping dependencies patched

  • Dependabot security updates are on for every lockfile: /, e2e-tests/, e2e-web/ and src-tauri/. Routine updates are grouped weekly (.github/dependabot.yml).
  • CodeQL default setup scans Actions, JavaScript and TypeScript, Python and Rust.
  • Secret scanning and push protection are on.
  • Every GitHub Action is pinned to a commit. The release workflow signs macOS builds with secrets that belong on the release environment, deployable only from main.

An alert with no fix upstream is dismissed with the reason in the alert, not left open: today that is glib (pinned through Tauri's GTK 3 stack) and extract-zip (no patched release; only the WebdriverIO harness uses it).

There aren't any published security advisories