Repository navigation
P0-F: explicit verified SV/OR/BL Browser Read and fixed-height IED card progress underline - #637
Draft
masarray wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
…ed thin IP underline
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Operator evidence (2026-10-20)
Live IED Browser XCBR1 shows Status/CF populated by MMS Read or Report but substitution SV (subEna/subVal/subQ/subID), origin OR (opRcvd/opOk/tOpOk), and blocking BL (blkEna) persist as Not read. Current
IedBrowserReadPlan.ReadableFcexcludes all three, even in explicitRead LN. The status is not evidence of a failed wire read; these FCs were never scheduled. Reference client shows concrete values, but is only observational evidence; code is independently determined from IEC model.Stack on #634 → #630 → #628; engine pin unchanged. DRAFT, no release/merge.