review skills: a comment convention for nominating guidance to the standard #82

Skill: pr-review, pr-fix, revise (scripts/record.py) · Plugin commit: 4495e1441dbd

Context.

• Reviewers already mark comments informally as meant for agents to learn from. In the reference run, several comments said so in their own words.
• Nothing in the harvest recognises it.
• A related mechanism exists. A PR body's Already checked block may carry a Nominated: line (the corrections a person made at the plan and diff gates). record.py reads it into inner.nominated (scripts/record.py:24, :132), and prepare.md step 5 adds it to clusters. It covers only the author's own build session, not reviewers.

Change.

• A documented convention any reviewer can type in a review comment or reply, for example a line starting Standard: or For agents:. record.py records it as a nominated item with its comment id and author.
• The next revision must list every nominated item: as a proposal if it meets revise: a single general statement from a person never reaches the report #78's bar, held with a reason otherwise. It is never silently dropped.
• pr-review and pr-fix preserve such lines when they draft or quote replies, and never write one themselves.
• The README and quickstart say how to use it, in one paragraph.

Done when. A fixture pull request with a For agents: reply produces a nominated item in its record, and the revision lists it.

Related: #78, #87. Tracked in #89.