Repository navigation
fix: guard overlapping scans and verify real offline browser flows - #29
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info
This PR blocks file selection, dropping, and submission during an active scan, corrects fallback AI status, and adds isolated browser tests against the Rust server.
WalkthroughAdds a browser end-to-end test setup and CI job. Browser tests cover scan results, indicator filters, upload handling, HTML escaping, and malformed JAR analysis. The web interface now blocks file selection and submission during scans, updates pipeline status handling, and adds accessible upload controls. CI builds the synthetic fixture and runs browser tests. The README documents local test setup and scope. Priority: ⬇️ Low Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to
|
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
@coderabbitai full review Please check single-flight scan controls, real-server test isolation, fallback status accuracy and the existing native fixture setup. Implementation and follow-up fixes are being handled directly. |
|
|
Codex Review: Something went wrong. Try again later by commenting “@codex review”. ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1710b4fc7d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Readiness root cause found: port 4190 is blocked by the Fetch standard (Node reported 'bad port') despite successful curl/native HTTP probes. Switched the fixture to 4191 and confirmed Node fetch returns 200. Also separated archive-validation skipping from AI-unavailable wording. @coderabbitai full review |
✅ Action performedFull review finished. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Another round soon, please! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
Changes
Verification
Performance change removes repeated detached-node allocation; no measured latency improvement is claimed yet.
@coderabbitai full review
@codex review