Skip to content

Say why the beacon sits beside the hydrogen line - #22

Merged
emptymalei merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/hydrogen-line-wording-huqxa3
Oct 19, 2026
Merged

emptymalei merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/hydrogen-line-wording-huqxa3

Conversation

@emptymalei

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Requested by L · project thread

Before: the homepage said the tone was "exactly hydrogen's line" with no reason given, so it read like a leftover of the older hydrogen/Water-Hole version of the story. Captions and the archive kicker showed 1420.405 MHz although the received tone is 1420.55 MHz.

After: the homepage (CN/EN) says the tone sits just above hydrogen's line, a ruler any radio-astronomy culture knows, and inside the pulsar-timing band, which is why the timing stations heard it first. The archive's 2219-09-28 entry says the uncorrected tone is only the carrier that reveals where it comes from, while the pulse timing is the message (the handshake). Captions now read 1420.55 MHz.

How: text-only edits in index.html, en/index.html, archive/2219-signal/index.html, archive/2219-signal/en/index.html. No script or style changes, so no ?v= bump.


Generated by Claude Code

The homepage said the tone was 'exactly hydrogen's line' with no reason,
and the archive gave 1420.405 MHz in captions while canon is 1420.55 MHz.
Now both pages say hydrogen's line is a ruler both sides know, that the
tone sits in the pulsar-timing band (why the timing stations heard it),
and that the uncorrected tone is only the carrier: its shift says where it
comes from, the pulse timing is the message.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KBvLthHMUdyvn4XfxdrvSq
@emptymalei emptymalei self-assigned this Oct 19, 2026
@emptymalei
emptymalei marked this pull request as ready for review October 19, 2026 19:45
@emptymalei
emptymalei merged commit dc8ce8a into main Oct 19, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants